« Search Engine Keyword Strategies and Tools - Knowing what keywords your audience will use in a search | Main | A Predictable Advance in Social Media »

Mar26
The Engagment Project and the Engagement Equation, Part 2
NextStage: Predictive Intelligence, Persuasion Engineering, Interactive Analytics and Behavioral Metrics Online engagement. What is it? Can you measure engagement online? Does online engagement exist in the real world? Or is it simply a subject du jour? What does it mean to say "A visitor is engaged?" WebAnalytics Demystified's Eric Peterson and I have been developing an formula for determining "online engagement". It's an interesting ride.

Everybody has an opinion and that's as far as I'm willing to comment on that. What I have little toleration for is people promoting their "engagement" metric without defining the term and providing definitive evidence that what they're measuring is what they've defined.

Gosh, I'm a finicky barstool, ain't I?

I keep on going back to something I wrote (long ago in internet time) in Starting the discussion: Attention, Engagement, Authority, Influence, ...:

  1. What do you mean when you use the words engagement, attention, and trust online?
  2. Can you repeatedly measure what you mean by them so that there's a reasonable surety that what you're measuring is what you mean by the terms you've used?
  3. Can you make these measurements through a commonly used web-enabled device?
First, I'll offer that online engagement exists. So does attention and trust (as defined in Attention, Engagement and Trust: The Internet Trinity and Websites).

This is a psycholinguist's perspective. Anything we have words for exists because we've created language to describe it. This is why we have beautiful pictures of things like angels and amoeba, unicorns and underwater life, ETs and electron microscopes. In other words, just because something can be named in cognitive reality doesn't mean it exists in physical reality.

In fact, things often don't exist in physical reality until we've created language for them.

And dear god, I do appreciate how much of a challenge the above statement can be to people, I truly do. I wrote about how common experience (hence language) can change reality in Expertise - Who Decides?

And bingo! I've given it away. Eric had come up with a formulation for "engagement". So had NextStage, several years back. I took a look at his formula and thought, "That's poop. That doesn't measure engagement."

One of the things I learned and strongly adhere to in business is something I learned while studying psychotherapy; Believe what the client tells you. They're putting lots of energy into it so honor them and believe they believe it. You don't have to believe it, you have to accept that they believe it.

Putting on those filters (I love changing my cognitive filters. Helps me understand things much better when I switch tool sets until I find one in which what's in front of me makes sense) I immediately recognized that Eric's formula makes complete sense in his frame of reference (traditional web analytics). His formula makes no sense in my frame of reference (cognitive science, etc).

My Eyes Open

Different frames of reference co-exist all the time. Ask any diplomat. Some of you may not know that diplomats -- whose tools are primarily language and information -- and mathematicians -- ditto -- have similar problem solving strategies.

Back up from Eric's definition. Back up from NextStage's definition. Back up from everyone's definitions. Determine commonalities, points of intersection, areas of overlap; is there a frame of reference in which all definitions are valid, a frame of reference in which any definition of "online engagement" is adds value to the solutions available (something mathematicians call a "solution space")?

Turns out there is. Mathematically it might not look simple and it is extremely simple. As I wrote in Continuing the discussion: Attention, Engagement, Authority, Influence and Measuring Online Engagement: Step One, the trick is to create a general frame of reference in which different definitions can both co-exist and are free to change as needs dictate.

Please contact NextStage for information regarding presentations and trainings on this and other topics.

Upcoming Trainings:

Upcoming Conferences: Come on by and say hello.

Sign up for the NextStage Irregular, our very irregular, definitely frequency-wise and probably topic-wise newsletter.


0 Comments/Trackbacks




submit a trackback

TrackBack URL for this entry:

post a comment

Name, Email Address, and URL are not required fields.





Comment Preview

« Search Engine Keyword Strategies and Tools - Knowing what keywords your audience will use in a search | Main | A Predictable Advance in Social Media »

Advertise

sponsored ads



subscribe


Prefer Email?
Subscribe below-

Enter your Email:


Powered by FeedBlitz What's this?

Current News

Support This Blog

My site was nominated for Best Business Blog!

business social media

Use these fast growing business social media sites to promote your business, feature your products, spotlight your business leaders, create links, and drive traffic back to your company site, all for free!

BIZZlogos - Add your logo - free link to your site
BIZZphotos - Add photos of your products and people
BIZZprofiles - Submit your profile and build your online visibility
BIZZspotlight - Spotlight your business with free links
BIZZvideos - Videos about businesses, products and business people.
BIZZbites - "Digg" for Business - Submit your articles and posts

know more media network

View Network Map

Network Feed List (OPML)

Know More Media Network
Feed


we support unitus

PRWeb

Influencer



BizMediaScience is a member of the Know More Media network of business related blogs.

Here are some current headlines from some of our business publications:

ProductivityGoal

CallCenterScript

AdHurl

TheBizofKnowledge

LandingTheDeal

CustomersAreAlways

HealthCareVox

BrainBasedBusiness

TheInsurancePolicy

MarketingBlurb