« Bad Joseph! No cake! (Part 2) | Main | Notes from UML's Strategic Management Class - Chau, Don't Stage a FoodFight Unless it Gets Your Message Across »

Apr 9
Sweetness' Research on Job Hunting, Part 3
NextStage: Predictive Intelligence, Persuasion Engineering, Interactive Analytics and Behavioral Metrics This is part 3 in an arc on Sweetness' ongoing research into how job hunting has changed in the internet age. I shared with Sweetness that people were commenting on what she offered to share more of her research. Sweetness is available for presentations on the topics of job hunting online and resume submission.

Part 1 in this arc described the story of FG, one of Sweetness' research subjects. Part 2 dealt with a qualified candidate dealing with a company that had some incredible expectations. Here we learn about misleading job postings.

 

"An incident similar what I described in Part 2 occurred to WS. The company again wanted someone with a Biotech/Marketing background, this time with antibody experience. WS thought great, they’d spent 10 years working with antibodies. After talking with the recruiter, the position was really 75% sales, 25% other. Nowhere in the job description did it say anything about doing, needing or being a sales person. WS said that no sales people he knew of did any of the things listed on the job requirements. The recruiter agreed, yet said that that was what the company wanted.

"Good luck to the recruiters in both instances."

Again, not sure how to comment on these stories. I accept them as true. I remember when I was job hunting and everything I'm reading from Sweetness validates my experiences and the experiences of those I've known over time.

It would help me considerably if readers would share experiences that go against Sweetness' research, if for no other reason than to read a counterpoint. Thanks.

More from Sweetness to follow...

Links for this post:

I'll be speaking at the San Francisco April '07 Emetrics Summit on Quantifying and Optimizing the Human Side of Online Marketing on May 7, 2007. Come on by and say hello.

5 Comments/Trackbacks




» Sweetness' Research on Job Hunting, Part 4 from BizMediaScience
More From Sweetness on Job Hunting Online, Part 4 [Read More]

» Sweetness' Research on Job Hunting, Part 7 from BizMediaScience
More From Sweetness on Job Hunting Online, Part 7 [Read More]

I applied for several Marketing Assistant positions at various companies before I became part of the Know More Media team. All except one was simply a secretarial position, requiring the person who was hired to run errands, file papers, answer phones and other clerical work. Some of them weren't even real marketing positions at all, instead they were pyramid schemes or the recruiter wanted me to work a day without pay as part of a second interview. Suffice it to say, I was very disappointed because I did not want to be anyone's secretary (been there done that). Of course I was more than willing to be an assistant if that meant being part of a creative team and working on real marketing projects, but the majority of positions to which I responded turned out to be something completely different from what they said they were. Was I expecting too much? Maybe... Should my standards be high, absolutely. Anyone who has busted their butts to get through college will have high standards, and rightfully so. Its even more disheartening to find that even the higher level positions are not what they seem. What is going on with the job market these days?

I appreciate your comments Kimberlee. They are unfortunately an example of what I am finding in my research. Either the job posting leaves out significant information, such as you'll be making 200 phone calls/day, you'll be a glorified gopher, or they include so much detail that you know there is no way one person could have done all that they require. No one could have all the experience they want and be willing to take a low salary that they are offering. The applicant with all of the experience required would be older and be worth more. Gone are the days of sign-on perks. Sadly, like a lot of people, businesses want everything for nothing.

Stay tuned... I'll update my research as I talk to more people.

Wow...two of my most favorite people on the planet commenting on my blog. I'm flattered!

submit a trackback

TrackBack URL for this entry:

post a comment

Name, Email Address, and URL are not required fields.





Comment Preview

« Bad Joseph! No cake! (Part 2) | Main | Notes from UML's Strategic Management Class - Chau, Don't Stage a FoodFight Unless it Gets Your Message Across »

Advertise

recent comments

    sponsored ads



    subscribe


    Prefer Email?
    Subscribe below-

    Enter your Email:


    Powered by FeedBlitz What's this?

    Current News

    Support This Blog

    blogroll


    My site was nominated for Best Business Blog!

    business social media

    Use these fast growing business social media sites to promote your business, feature your products, spotlight your business leaders, create links, and drive traffic back to your company site, all for free!

    BIZZlogos - Add your logo - free link to your site
    BIZZphotos - Add photos of your products and people
    BIZZprofiles - Submit your profile and build your online visibility
    BIZZspotlight - Spotlight your business with free links
    BIZZvideos - Videos about businesses, products and business people.
    BIZZbites - "Digg" for Business - Submit your articles and posts

    Know More Media - Management / Operations

    know more media network

    View Network Map

    Network Feed List (OPML)

    Know More Media Network
    Feed


    we support unitus

    PRWeb

    Influencer



    BizMediaScience is a member of the Know More Media network of business related blogs.

    Here are some current headlines from some of our business publications:

    ProductivityGoal

    CallCenterScript

    AdHurl

    TheBizofKnowledge

    LandingTheDeal

    CustomersAreAlways

    HealthCareVox

    BrainBasedBusiness

    TheInsurancePolicy

    MarketingBlurb