« Nothing New Under the Sun (Humanic Search Engines, finale) | Main | Searching, Searching Everywhere and Not a Link to Click, part 1 »

Feb 2
Political Campaigns on the Web
NextStage: Predictive Intelligence, Persuasion Engineering, Interactive Analytics and Behavioral Metrics More and more political hopefuls are coming around NH these days and, in case you didn't know, NH is famous for it's first in the nation primary. It's fought to keep that distinction as of late and that's a pity because -- although I don't think NH knows it yet -- they've already lost.

The first in the nation primary is now owned by the 'net. I was recently interviewed by WMUR-TV in Manchester, NH, about how campaigns are using websites. In preparation for that interview we did a TargetTrack analysis of Clinton's, McCain's, Obama's and Romney's campaign sites. Here's a quick rundown of what we found.

 

First, NH has indeed lost the first in the nation primary status. I don't mean votes are going to be cast on the web, at least not in the literal sense, but as more and more people are turning to the 'net as their primary information source (as referenced in my interview with Brad Berens regarding SuperBowl XLI advertising) the decisions they make are going to be more and more web driven.

As I stated in the WMUR interview, the final analysis -- at least for this election cycle -- is still going to be on the personal level. Voters are still going to want to get out and "test drive", "get a feel for", "listen directly", "see for myself", pick your metaphor of social engagement, what the candidates are about. So far that can't be done on the web (rich media aside).

However, the preliminary analysis -- the decision about which candidate to see/listen/get a feel for/etc. is going to be done on the web. This is nothing more than the extension of what's gone before -- watching them on TV, listening to them on the radio, reading about them in the newspaper. Technology changes how we gather information when make our preliminary choices, not how we actually make them. That offered, an analysis of four campaign site homepages as they're published today, 2 Feb 07, and listed alphabetically.

Clinton:Hillary.jpg The first thing to notice is the color choice -- primarily blue. This is a color most often selected by males as a "favorite" color, therefore the drive to a male audience is made. In tandem with that is the establishment of Ms. Clinton as an authority and an authoritative sort of person. Again, a good play towards a male audience. The site also has some "awareness" features for return visitors. This is a good thing in most cases as today's internet travelers want to know they're recognized -- to a point. Too much identification is never a good thing except with a truly 'net savvy audience. The "MAKE HISTORY!" item is a nice open statement and a good invitation except that people who are testing the "Clinton waters" might not be sure what they're being invited to take part in.

McCain:McCain.jpg This site is very nicely done and demonstrates a deep awareness of McCain's audience, both actual and intended. There's no scrolling necessary. The site's entire message is "No Nonsense" and "Get things Done". The reloads are essentially black&white. Again, no middle ground, no vacillation. Very much a "Do this, get that" message. This is excellent for the audience he seems to be going after. He won't sell well to people who aren't "action" oriented or who want to know their voice is being heard. Similarly to Ms. Clinton's site, there are some "awareness" features which can be good or not so good as mentioned before.

Obama:Obama.jpg This site is suffering from a big problem and the problem is simple. Too simple, in fact. The site's simplicity can come across as not having any real messages defined as of yet. This is truly an "exploratory" site, it's purpose from a web communications point of view is to find out if people are interested, period. My guess would be that these folks are paying very close attention to their traffic numbers and will make plans from there.

Romney:Romney.jpg What's most striking about this site is it's use of "Bush" imagery, an indication that Governor Romney is hoping to get the voters who were George W. Bush voters in past elections. Also, this homepage is way too large and is a polarity example of Barack Obama's site; There's so much information that a strong single message is hard to find. As above, this site is waiting to figure out what message it should promote. Right now these folks are waiting to see how much interest there is -- another traffic issue -- before going further. Also, like the Clinton site, there's good use of power colors.

There's much more that can be gleaned (including suggestions on how to improve website appeal and performance, increasing gender, age and demographic targeting) and, as noted above, this was just a quick scan with TargetTrack. Feel free to comment if you'd like or contact NextStage for more information. As always, enjoy.

Links for this post:

Please contact NextStage for information regarding presentations and trainings on this and other topics.

6 Comments/Trackbacks




Gotta make sure this stands out a bit more:

HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO YOU
HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO YOU
HAPPY BIRTHDAY, DEAR JOSEPH
HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO YOU

ta da. I'd have sent an ecard, but I couldn't find one that offered up a birthday cannoli.

If God had meant for us to vote, he would have given us some real candidates. . . :-)

By the way, HAPPY BIRTHDAY!

*grin*

Thanks for the birthday wishes, one and all. - Joseph

» Know More Media Review: Digital Ethnography, a Blogging Challenge and Childhood Wisdom from Know More Media
I did not escape the Super Bowl hype. I tried!   On the Know More Media network, CIO Tim Stay presented the Top Ten 2007 Super Bowl Ads series. Whew! I was glad not to have to sit through... [Read More]

» Politics: NPR makes their predictions and here are ours, Part 1 from BizMediaScience
Who would win if the nation were to vote today, 10 Feb 07? (part 1) [Read More]

» Politics: NPR makes their predictions and here are ours, Part 2 from BizMediaScience
Who would win if the nation were to vote today, 10 Feb 07? (part 2) [Read More]

submit a trackback

TrackBack URL for this entry:

post a comment

Name, Email Address, and URL are not required fields.





Comment Preview

« Nothing New Under the Sun (Humanic Search Engines, finale) | Main | Searching, Searching Everywhere and Not a Link to Click, part 1 »

Advertise

sponsored ads



subscribe


Prefer Email?
Subscribe below-

Enter your Email:


Powered by FeedBlitz What's this?

Current News

Support This Blog

My site was nominated for Best Business Blog!

business social media

Use these fast growing business social media sites to promote your business, feature your products, spotlight your business leaders, create links, and drive traffic back to your company site, all for free!

BIZZlogos - Add your logo - free link to your site
BIZZphotos - Add photos of your products and people
BIZZprofiles - Submit your profile and build your online visibility
BIZZspotlight - Spotlight your business with free links
BIZZvideos - Videos about businesses, products and business people.
BIZZbites - "Digg" for Business - Submit your articles and posts

know more media network

View Network Map

Network Feed List (OPML)

Know More Media Network
Feed


we support unitus

PRWeb

Influencer



BizMediaScience is a member of the Know More Media network of business related blogs.

Here are some current headlines from some of our business publications:

ProductivityGoal

CallCenterScript

AdHurl

TheBizofKnowledge

LandingTheDeal

CustomersAreAlways

HealthCareVox

BrainBasedBusiness

TheInsurancePolicy

MarketingBlurb