« Where Noisy Data Meets Standards (The Noisy Data arc, Part 9) | Main | The Noisy Data arc, Part 11 »

Jan28
The Noisy Data arc, Part 10
NextStage: Predictive Intelligence, Persuasion Engineering, Interactive Analytics and Behavioral Metrics This is part 10 of the The Noisy Data Arc. I left off with the comment "The downside of coming from a completely different paradigm and dealing with what most people consider noisy data is that (in NextStage's case) the tools (ET) are either stoneknives or cellphones to most people investigating them."

I'm reminded of a line from Brian W. Aldiss' short story, "Old Hundredth":
"...useless to deny that it is well-nigh impossible to improve anything, however faulty, that has so much tradition behind it. And the origins of your bit of metricism are indeed embedded in such a fearful antiquity that we must needs -- "
Anyway, on with the arc!

 

So in talking with FindMeFaster's Matt Van Wagner and going over my conversations with Coremetrics' Angie Brown, I mentioned that in the beginning and because ET was considered a disruptive technology, most of our first five years were spent waiting for our market to emerge or for our plateau to intersect with everybody else's plateaus.

This intersection started when visualization packages first started appearing in web analytics. NextStage benefitted from this because the concept of "behavioral" started becoming lingua franca. Even though NextStage's definition of "behavioral" isn't the industry standard (surprise!) at least the word is out there.

Angie and I both agree that such packages are fun to watch and don't provide a lot of actionability. Responses to Visualizing...what? indicate that most users feel the same way. It's kind of like getting a racetrack when you're a kid. You can only watch that car go around that loop so many times before you end up saying, "Yeah? Now what?"

I had been mulling over Angie's tool definitions; simple reports use all the data, more complex reports use less data.This is true at the machine level because you can isolate machine components to test them separately before putting them into the machine as a whole. It's a "Is the plane safe?" versus "How does landing gear work?" type of thing. In order to answer the former you need to know an awful lot about the whole plane, to answer the second you only need to know about one subsystem of the plane.

(just a few more entries in this arc, I promise) 

Links for this arc:


0 Comments/Trackbacks




submit a trackback

TrackBack URL for this entry:

post a comment

Name, Email Address, and URL are not required fields.





Comment Preview

« Where Noisy Data Meets Standards (The Noisy Data arc, Part 9) | Main | The Noisy Data arc, Part 11 »

Advertise

sponsored ads



subscribe


Prefer Email?
Subscribe below-

Enter your Email:


Powered by FeedBlitz What's this?

Current News

Support This Blog

My site was nominated for Best Business Blog!

business social media

Use these fast growing business social media sites to promote your business, feature your products, spotlight your business leaders, create links, and drive traffic back to your company site, all for free!

BIZZlogos - Add your logo - free link to your site
BIZZphotos - Add photos of your products and people
BIZZprofiles - Submit your profile and build your online visibility
BIZZspotlight - Spotlight your business with free links
BIZZvideos - Videos about businesses, products and business people.
BIZZbites - "Digg" for Business - Submit your articles and posts

know more media network

View Network Map

Network Feed List (OPML)

Know More Media Network
Feed


we support unitus

PRWeb

Influencer



BizMediaScience is a member of the Know More Media network of business related blogs.

Here are some current headlines from some of our business publications:

ProductivityGoal

CallCenterScript

AdHurl

TheBizofKnowledge

LandingTheDeal

CustomersAreAlways

HealthCareVox

BrainBasedBusiness

TheInsurancePolicy

MarketingBlurb