« Quorum Sensing | Main | Making Good on Past Promises - Making Things Sticky »

Jan14
Standards and Noisy Data, Part 4
NextStage: Predictive Intelligence, Persuasion Engineering, Interactive Analytics and Behavioral Metrics This is part 4 in the noisy data in web analytics arc. Part 1 defined noisy data, part 2 extended the concept into creating standards for new web technologies and part 3 considers where metrics, standards and noisy data might take us if we're not careful.

This entry borrows heavily from discussion I had with Angie Brown, Strategic Services Consultant for Coremetrics.

 

For the purposes of commercial analytics packages, the first choice when dealing with noisy data is to throw out the noise. This isn't as haphazard as it sounds. The more commercial an analytics solution is the scalable it must be and one of the ways to scalability is to categorize the data into very specific buckets. You might think of throwing out the noise as categorizing it into a junk bucket similar to a junk folder in your email client.

The reason for categorization is to determine what's important and what isn't. At the simplest reporting level all analytics packages use all the data. It's when you get into very complex reports that each analytics vendor gets to demonstrate their unique strengths because, at this level, you're winnowing out details to report on very specific items which don't require that all details necessarily be present.

The change that noisy data brings is that a new question needs to be answered, "What is this page's purpose?" The question use to be (and in many cases still is) "What happened on this page?" Interestingly enough, that latter question, when the psycho- and neuro-linguistic concept of chunking is applied, becomes "What event happened on this page?" which, in the world of RIA, Rich Media and Web 2.0, becomes "What events were triggered on this page?" Semphonics has published an interesting paper on page purpose and I've written about understanding the intersection of visitor and page purpose in several places. Where Semphonics and NextStage might disagree is in how the concept of purpose is best achieved.

Next up, answering the real question of analysis.

Links for this arc:


0 Comments/Trackbacks




submit a trackback

TrackBack URL for this entry:

post a comment

Name, Email Address, and URL are not required fields.





Comment Preview

« Quorum Sensing | Main | Making Good on Past Promises - Making Things Sticky »

Advertise

sponsored ads



subscribe


Prefer Email?
Subscribe below-

Enter your Email:


Powered by FeedBlitz What's this?

Current News

Support This Blog

My site was nominated for Best Business Blog!

business social media

Use these fast growing business social media sites to promote your business, feature your products, spotlight your business leaders, create links, and drive traffic back to your company site, all for free!

BIZZlogos - Add your logo - free link to your site
BIZZphotos - Add photos of your products and people
BIZZprofiles - Submit your profile and build your online visibility
BIZZspotlight - Spotlight your business with free links
BIZZvideos - Videos about businesses, products and business people.
BIZZbites - "Digg" for Business - Submit your articles and posts

know more media network

View Network Map

Network Feed List (OPML)

Know More Media Network
Feed


we support unitus

PRWeb

Influencer



BizMediaScience is a member of the Know More Media network of business related blogs.

Here are some current headlines from some of our business publications:

ProductivityGoal

CallCenterScript

AdHurl

TheBizofKnowledge

LandingTheDeal

CustomersAreAlways

HealthCareVox

BrainBasedBusiness

TheInsurancePolicy

MarketingBlurb