« Finding People in The Village | Main | Nothing New Under the Sun (Humanic Search Engines, part 3) »

Jan31
More Responses to "Coming Soon: The Death of the WebPage"
NextStage: Predictive Intelligence, Persuasion Engineering, Interactive Analytics and Behavioral Metrics I'm continuing to get comments on the Death of WebPage IMedia Connection article. One reader's questions encouraged me to expand a bit on what I'd written previously. The specific question involved personalizing the microsite.

My opinion is that personalizing the microsite is going to depend on what tools are available to people wanting to customize their experience (a browser add on) and what tools the site provider is willing to make available.

 

For example, let's say the NYTimes and WashingtonPost portlets are side by side in a browser "window". The portlet making the most advertising dollars is the one you spend the most time in. How does NYT or WP insure you spend the most time in their portlet? By letting you customize it to the point it's no longer recognizable as the NYT or WP portlet. But at that level of customization, is there still room for their advertisers in the portlet?

Any service that is provided for free isn't really provided for free and I use the newspaper portlet idea intentionally. People could subscribe to a newspaper but all that did was pay for delivery, if that. The real money came from advertising dollars and the newspaper got advertising dollars by showing how many subscribers it had.

This "Somebody's gotta pay" model is also true for the internet. The cost of internet publishing is much less than print and most print outlets are now becoming indicia of their related websites. Still, a large paper's online publication costs are substantial and advertising revenues are still derived by the number of subscribers, number of unique visitors, number of downloads, ...

If I, the consumer, am totally paying for my portlet then I can customize it the way I want. This also means that I have to pay for any content I pull from NYT, WP, etc., to place in my portlet. How much am I, the consumer, willing to let NYT, WP, etc., subsidize my personal experience by providing me their content? Even if they don't put their advertising in my feed, they're still dropping cookies all over the place when I do so.

That's what I'm thinking right now, anyway. Let me know what you think, and thanks.

Please contact NextStage for information regarding presentations and trainings on this and other topics.

Links for this post:


0 Comments/Trackbacks




submit a trackback

TrackBack URL for this entry:

post a comment

Name, Email Address, and URL are not required fields.





Comment Preview

« Finding People in The Village | Main | Nothing New Under the Sun (Humanic Search Engines, part 3) »

Advertise

sponsored ads



subscribe


Prefer Email?
Subscribe below-

Enter your Email:


Powered by FeedBlitz What's this?

Current News

Support This Blog

My site was nominated for Best Business Blog!

business social media

Use these fast growing business social media sites to promote your business, feature your products, spotlight your business leaders, create links, and drive traffic back to your company site, all for free!

BIZZlogos - Add your logo - free link to your site
BIZZphotos - Add photos of your products and people
BIZZprofiles - Submit your profile and build your online visibility
BIZZspotlight - Spotlight your business with free links
BIZZvideos - Videos about businesses, products and business people.
BIZZbites - "Digg" for Business - Submit your articles and posts

know more media network

View Network Map

Network Feed List (OPML)

Know More Media Network
Feed


we support unitus

PRWeb

Influencer



BizMediaScience is a member of the Know More Media network of business related blogs.

Here are some current headlines from some of our business publications:

ProductivityGoal

CallCenterScript

AdHurl

TheBizofKnowledge

LandingTheDeal

CustomersAreAlways

HealthCareVox

BrainBasedBusiness

TheInsurancePolicy

MarketingBlurb